The Maharashtra Housing (Regulation and Development) Bill 2012 a farce or reality examines Adv. R. P. Rathod.

Shri. Sachin. Ahir., Minister of State for Housing, had reintroduced "The Bill", along with the recommendations given by the 19-member committee, in the legislative assembly on Monday the 16^th July 2012. After discussions finally the Bill has been passed by both houses of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly and was supported by the opposition, however only a handful of legislators were present in the House when the bill was approved. As the Bill involves punitive actions like imprisonment, hence the bill will have to be sent for the President’s assent.

. . .Read More

Builders will get upto 35% of extra FSI, but will have to pay Premium for the same

 CM Okays Civic Chief’s Plan.

The BMC & the Builders are the ultimate beneficiaries after the amendment in the Development Control (DC) Rules, 1991 – interprets Adv. R. P. Rathod.

The Chief Minister Shri. Prithviraj Chavan on Tuesday Okayed a path-breaking policy to streamline building approvals in the city and check the nexus between unscrupulous developers and Municipal Officials who sanction Building Plans.

. . .Read More

Ten important changes in the New Bye-Laws of Co-operative Housing Society – 2009

Ten important changes in the New Bye-Laws of Co-operative Housing Society – 2009 by Adv. R. P. Rathod.

New model Bye Laws 2009 for Co-operative societies have some changes incorporated as compared with the Bye Laws of 2001. These Bye Laws have been printed in English & Marathi by the Mumbai District Co-operative Housing Federation Ltd. After approval of the Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar Co-operative Societies, Maharashtra State, Pune given vide letter dated 24.12.2010. 

. . .Read More

Real Estate Regulation Bill aimed to bring more transparency in Property Sector.

But What is the ground realty, Adv. R. P. Rathod analysis the said Bill and throws light on some of its important aspects, advantages and disadvantages of the proposed Bills.

The Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation has released the final draft of the New Real Estate (Regulation and Development) bill, designed to stop malpractices and bring in transparency into the real estate section. According to the bill, for which feedback is currently being invited, violations will involve imprisonment of up to three years, and penalty of 10 per cent of the estimated cost of the project. The bill is expected to be passed during the winter session of Parliament.

. . .Read More

New Law is being proposed to ensure that Consumers are not duped

The government is framing a new law to amplify consumer rights. The idea is to empower consumers to sue manufacturers and service providers who dupe them by concealing information in a manner that their purchase decisions are wrongly influenced. Under the proposed law, the firms will also be prosecuted for not issuing receipts of purchases to consumers.

The government is planning to create a simple, inexpensive and quicker justice delivery system, where the consumer can haul up any company, large or small, in a new court called ‘National Consumer Protection Court Authority.’ A brainchild of the consumer affairs, food and public distribution ministry, the new judicial system will work on the lines of the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

A draft Cabinet note has already been circulated among various ministries in this regard. According to the note, the penalty will be equal to the value of the product or the service along with an interest. The note proposes to amend the Consumer Protection Act 1986.

Currently, there are certain opportunities under law for the consumers to sue the service providers. For instance, a patient can sue his doctor for withholding information and forcing him to go for an unnecessary surgery. Similarly, a telecom service provider who misleads subscribers through hidden charges while advertising schemes can also be sued. The proposed law would broaden the scope of this tool in the hands of consumers by including other products and services also.

The proposed quasi-judicial authority will aim to deliver speedy justice. Unlike consumer courts, where it takes years for the verdicts to be delivered, it promises justice within 10 days. Its judgment can be appealed only in the Supreme Court. As of now, there is a huge gap between the time a case is filed and the time it comes up for hearing. Also, as per the Bill, any request for adjournment of a case would have to be accompanied with genuine reasons.

The proposed move will also define ‘unfair contract’ to protect the weaker party from incurring losses arising out of unfair trade practices. The Consumer Protection (Amendment) Bill will replace the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, which will help in faster disposal of consumer cases.

There are 35 state consumer disputes redressal commissions and 610 district consumer forums in the country. There is one National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at the apex level. About 29,000 cases were filed in these forums up to 2008.

-      Adv. R. P. Rathod.

Advocate High Court, Mumbai.

. . .Read More