Showing posts with label Delay in possession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Delay in possession. Show all posts

Consumer Forum directed a builder to pay Rs. 11.50 Lakhs for failure to provide OC.

The Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum recently held the builders guilty for deficiency in services and ordered them to pay to a Housing Society at Borivali an amount of more than Rs. 11.50 Lakhs for failure to fulfil the Statutory and contractual obligations. In this matter the Consumer Court have also considered compensation of a sum of more than Rs 2 Lakhs towards Legal and other expenses for causing a deficiency of services.

. . .Read More

Before investing your hard earned money in a house, make sure you have chosen a reputed builder

After staying in a leave and license accommodation for many years, an enthusiast dreaming to have his own house, eventually bought a flat in Borivli by taking a home loan. Since shifting was a priori­ty to save the dual cost of the lease rental and the loan repayment on his new pur­chase, he readily signed a letter stating that he was be­ing given the keys to his flat by the builder pending the completion of the building for carrying out furniture work

. . .Read More

Thane based Builder ordered to pay Rs. 7.5 Lakhs for giving a Smaller Flat examines Adv. R. P. Rathod.



The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission recently ordered a Thane based Builder M/S Animesh Enterprises to pay Mr. Mangesh. Ghadge. a total of Rs 7.5 Lakhs for causing a deficit of 150 sq ft area. Alternatively, the builder will have to provide 150sq ft area to the Complainant.

Adv. R. P. Rathod. throws light on the facts of the Case: On June 6, 1999, Ghadge and the builders entered into an agreement. The builder had agreed to sell the flat measuring 600 sq ft on the 3rd floor of the proposed building. The 222.4 sq meter land at Lohar Lane, Thane, on which the construction was set to take place, belonged to Ghadge. The agreement also provided that the completed flat would be handed over on or before November 27, 2001.

. . .Read More

Builder to pay Compensation for Delay in handing over possession of Flat



An analysis of the judgment passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi by Adv. R. P. Rathod.

The said judgment is issued in the matter of Mrs. Veena Khanna of New Delhi Vs M/s. Ansal Properties and Adharshila Towers, New Delhi: Before National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi: Order dated 9th July 2007.

. . .Read More

Builder to pay Buyer Rs 1.5 Lakhs for delay of 9 months in handing over possession.



In a recent Court Ruling - Developer gives buyer apartments 9 months late, with incomplete documents, no Electricity or Water Connection


. . .Read More