Members must pay their dues regularly in order to ensure smooth functioning of their societies examines Adv. R. P. Rathod.

 Do you pay your CHS dues on time?

Adv. R. P. Rathod. emphasis that “It is the duty of every member to pay dues properly & on time for ensuring the smooth functioning of the society.” Generally people living in (Co-operative Housing Society) CHS are well aware of the fact that they are required to pay their regular contributions towards the expenses and expenditure incurred for running the day-to-day affairs of the society. Remember, a CHS is never formed for making profits instead it collects and dis­burses the contributions from its members towards common facilities and services enjoyed by its mem­bers.

. . .Read More

Societies read this for members not vacating the flats for Re-development of the society building

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

NOTICE OF MOTION NO: 707 OF 2010 IN

SUIT (LODGING) NO. 229 OF 2010

M/s. Jasmina Constructions Pvt. Ltd. ...Plaintiffs.

Vs.
Mandapeshwar Kripa Co-operative Housing Society Limited & Ors: Defendants

Mr. Rajiv Narula with Mr. Basant Trilokani i/by M/s. Jhangiani Narula & Associates for the Plaintiffs

Mr. S. U. Kamdar, Sr. Counsel with Mr. Vinay Deshpande with Ms. Meenakshi Mhapeukar i/by M/s. Shamim & Co. for Defendant No.

1. Mr. Ajay M. Talreja for Defendant No. 8

Mr. Deepak S. Jadhav for Defendant Nos. 2, 3, 4 & 6

. . .Read More

Minority Members obstructing Redevelopment

Minority Members obstructing Redevelopment, read this says Adv. R. P. Rathod.

Here I have published four judgments passed by High Court of Mumbai in the matter of Minority v/s majority of members agreeing to the proposal of Redevelopment which are contradictory to each other.

However, the High Court Judgments dated 11/12/2009 and 28/06/2010 over rule all the earlier Judgments the High Court has given in September, 2007 and on dated 09/12/2009. All the four cases are summarized here under:

. . .Read More

Demolition of Society Property by sidelining minority members

The Mumbai High Court has deeply analyzed the legal issues at stake while redeveloping properties of co-operative housing societies when there is dissent by a few members. The stakeholders and persons concerned in such cases should include the society, the developer, minority members, consultants, and municipal authorities.

There have been sharp reactions from such quarters. It is unfortunate that a well-worded and analyzed decision of the court has given rise to apprehensions. In my view, these are unfounded.

. . .Read More